Brain eating amoeba claim another victim |
The most terrifying creature lurking below the
water’s surface does not have fins or razor sharp teeth. In fact, you can’t see it at all. The
microscopic amoeba, Naegleria fowleri, is
best known for its grotesque ability to digest and consume its victim’s brain. This ‘brain-eating’ amoeba may sound like Eli
Roth’s latest stomach-turning horror flick, but it’s no work of fiction and
it’s in the water. Each year, this
amoeba kills more people than sharks do in the United States1.
The single-celled organism can cause the deadly brain infection called
primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), a disease that is nearly always fatal2.
Here is what you should know about the deadly infection and the current
research desperately seeking to find a treatment.
Infection occurs when a rush of contaminated water
enters the nose and the amoeba moves up the nasal cavity and into the brain3.
These tiny organisms swim by twitching fingerlike extensions called,
pseudopods2.
Once inside the brain, the parasite begins releasing proteins that cause
nerve and red blood cells to lyse, or break open, spilling the cell’s innards
for the organism to devour2.
The parasite can also use ‘sucking structures,’ known as ‘food-cups,’
located on the outside of the organism to rip open cells and feed on the
brain’s grey-matter4.
This process is shown in the figure below which was captured using a
scanning electron microscope capable of viewing these microscopic
organisms. The amoeba can be seen
tearing apart and devouring a cell5.
Destruction of these cells leads to severe swelling and necrosis, or tissue
death, resulting in devastating damage to the brain and often brain
hemorrhaging6.
Symptoms of the PAM progress quickly, often involving fever, nausea,
seizures, severe frontal headaches, and vomiting6.
Death generally occurs within 7-10 days of infection6.
N. fowleri attacking and devouring cell observed using SEM. (Bar is equal to 10 µm)5 |
While uncommon, the disease is virtually always
fatal6.
Between 0 and 8 infections are reported every year in the United States7.
Only three people have ever survived6.
This is in part due to the difficulty detecting and treating the
infection6.
Early symptoms often resemble the flu or other viral illnesses resulting
in misdiagnosis for 74% of initial healthcare visits during the beginning
stages of the disease6.
As the disease progresses, incorrect diagnosis of bacterial meningitis
results because the symptoms are nearly identical consequently leading to 94%
of patients of patients receiving inappropriate treatment prior to diagnosis
with PAM6.
Diagnosing PAM requires visually examining cerebrospinal fluid for
motile amoebas6.
For timely identification, it is important for doctors to ask about
possible risk of exposure, such as recent freshwater swimming, in order to
begin treatment as early as possible6.
Exposure to the amoeba typically occurs while
swimming, diving, or during other water-related activities8.
The amoeba is present in freshwater sources including lakes, rivers, and
untreated swimming pools8. Public health authorities are
encouraged to regularly monitor recreational waters at risk of contamination
and post appropriate warnings where high amounts of the amoeba have been
identified9.
Proper chlorination of public pools can eliminate risk of infection9. Despite these attempts, infections
do still occur and the only known way to prevent infection is by avoiding nasal
contact with untreated fresh water7.
Despite the low risk of an infection with the
amoeba, water monitoring programs have shown that the organism is
wide-spread. A study examining water
sources in Arizona found the amoeba present in 17 out of the 19 samples
collected10.
The question many experts have asked, is why then, do infections seem to
be so rare? “Almost every single person has antibodies in their blood which
indicate they were exposed at some point in time to the amoeba, but they didn’t
die from it,” said expert, Dr. Francine Marciano-Cabral, a professor of
microbiology and immunology at Virginia Commonwealth University who has studied
N. fowleri for more than 30 years11.
She explains it could be that infection requires an encounter with a
large number of amoebas all at one time or, there may be a particular
subspecies which causes infection in humans while other subspecies are
nonthreatening11.
Nearly all cases in the United States had occurred in southern states
(see map below), but recent expansion has brought the disease northward12.
Reported cases of PAM |
In August 2010, the first confirmed case of PAM
in a northern state occurred in Minnesota and it was associated with local
freshwater exposure6,12.
Since then, three additional cases have been reported in the Midwest
necessitating better awareness among providers across the US6,12.
The amoeba is thermophilic meaning it thrives and rapidly multiplies in
warm temperatures9.
The projected increase in temperatures due to global temperature change
could result in the infection being introduced to more areas that were previously
unaffected9.
Recently, the number of infections reported annually appear to be rising
which could be a cause for concern6,13.
While this may be due to improvements in surveillance, it is believed
that cases are still largely underreported6. Whether the increasing temperature
will lead to an increase in infections remains to be seen. Overall, the increase of infections,
expansion of the amoeba’s geographical range, and high fatality associated with
the disease makes finding an effective treatment for the infection more pressing.
One area of current research, aimed at finding a
treatment for the disease, involves understanding the amoeba’s ‘brain-eating’
abilities. How the amoeba destroys brain
tissue is not fully known. Studies,
focused on the potential causes for these deadly effects, suggest proteins
released by the amoeba may be involved.
Dr. Kenneth Aldape believes cysteine proteases may be contributing to
the tissue destruction caused by the amoeba14.
Cysteine proteases are enzymes that work by cutting up proteins into
pieces9. This damage can eventually result in the
death of the cell14.
These conclusions were based on experiments where an irreversible
cysteine protease inhibitor was applied to the amoeba14.
The inhibitor inactivates the amoeba’s enzyme preventing it working
properly. When the inhibitor was added
to the amoeba? They were no longer able to kill cells14.
These results suggest that these specific enzymes are required in order
for the amoeba to kill cells during infection14.
While non-disease causing amoeba produce similar proteases, the ability
to function at human body temperature is unique to this particular species15.
One specific set of
these cysteine proteases investigators are focusing on is, naegleriapores,
which poke holes into the cell-membrane exposing the cell’s interior16.
Two of these proteins, named naegleriapore A and B, were discovered by
Dr. Rosa Herbst at the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine in
Germany16.
The studies by Dr. Herbst identified these proteins by measuring their
ability to pierce the cell-membrane16.
Examining the structure of these proteins unveiled that they were
actually fragments of the same, larger protein16,17.
A process leading to a large arsenal of protein forms capable of
destroying cells16,17.
The identification of
these proteins is an important step towards understanding this deadly
disease. Scientists are hopeful that one
of these proteins may lead to a treatment.
Until then, education for rapid diagnosis and treatment are
essential.
Works Cited
1. Human
Shark Bait. National Geographic Channel - Videos, TV Shows & Photos -
Canada at <http://natgeotv.com/ca/human-shark-bait>
2. John, D. T. Primary Amebic
Meningoencephalitis and the Biology of Naegleria Fowleri. Annu. Rev.
Microbiol. 36, 101–123 (1982).
3. Jarolim, K. L., McCosh, J. K., Howard,
M. J. & John, D. T. A light microscopy study of the migration of naegleria
fowleri from the nasal submucosa to the central nervous system during the early
stage of primary amebic meningoencephalitis in mice. J. Parasitol. 86,
50–55 (2000).
4. Brown, T. OBSERVATIONS BY
IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY AND ELECTRON MICROSCOPY ON THE CYTOPATHOGENICITY
OF NAEGLERIA FOWLERI IN MOUSE EMBRYO-CELL CULTURES. J. Med. Microbiol. 12,
363–371 (1979).
5. John, D. T., Cole, T. B. &
Marciano-Cabral, F. M. Sucker-like structures on the pathogenic amoeba
Naegleria fowleri. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47, 12–14 (1984).
6. Capewell, L. G. et al.
Diagnosis, Clinical Course, and Treatment of Primary Amoebic
Meningoencephalitis in the United States, 1937-2013. J. Pediatr. Infect.
Dis. Soc. (2014). doi:10.1093/jpids/piu103
7. Primary Amebic Meningoencephalitis
(PAM) | Naegleria fowleri | CDC. at
<http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/naegleria/>
8. Heggie, T. W. Swimming with death:
Naegleria fowleri infections in recreational waters. Travel Med. Infect.
Dis. 8, 201–206 (2010).
9. Visvesvara, G. S., Moura, H. &
Schuster, F. L. Pathogenic and opportunistic free-living amoebae: Acanthamoeba
spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria fowleri, and Sappinia diploidea. FEMS
Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 50, 1–26 (2007).
10. Marciano-Cabral, F., MacLean, R., Mensah,
A. & LaPat-Polasko, L. Identification of Naegleria fowleri in Domestic
Water Sources by Nested PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69,
5864–5869 (2003).
11. 21, P. S. | 10:15 a m A., Updated, 2015 |,
24, 5:21 p m | Aug & 2015. Rare brain-wasting amoeba suspected in San Diego
death. The San Diego Union-Tribune at
<http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2015/aug/21/amoeba-brain-infection/>
12. Kemble, S. K. et al. Fatal
Naegleria fowleri infection acquired in Minnesota: possible expanded range of a
deadly thermophilic organism. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis.
Soc. Am. 54, 805–809 (2012).
13. Krainik, F., Merle, G. & Bertin, M.
[Will Naegleria fowleri become a public health problem?]. Sem. Hôp. Organe
Fondé Par Assoc. Enseign. Méd. Hôp. Paris 59, 775–782 (1983).
14. Aldape, K., Huizinga, H., Bouvier, J.
& Mckerrow, J. Naegleria fowleri: Characterization of a Secreted Histolytic
Cysteine Protease. Exp. Parasitol. 78, 230–241 (1994).
15. Jamerson, M., da Rocha-Azevedo, B.,
Cabral, G. A. & Marciano-Cabral, F. Pathogenic Naegleria fowleri and
non-pathogenic Naegleria lovaniensis exhibit differential adhesion to, and
invasion of, extracellular matrix proteins. Microbiology 158,
791–803 (2012).
16. Herbst, R., Marciano-Cabral, F. &
Leippe, M. Antimicrobial and pore-forming peptides of free-living and
potentially highly pathogenic Naegleria fowleri are released from the same
precursor molecule. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 25955–25958 (2004).
17. Herbst, R. et al. Pore-forming
polypeptides of the pathogenic protozoon Naegleria fowleri. J. Biol. Chem.
277, 22353–22360 (2002).
No comments:
Post a Comment